|
|
Post by IRON BALLS on Aug 16, 2006 14:20:04 GMT -5
Which one is your favorite?  |
|
|
|
Post by Warpig on Aug 16, 2006 14:46:29 GMT -5
Stones for me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jesse on Aug 16, 2006 15:24:45 GMT -5
Stones
|
|
|
|
Post by jimmccormick3 on Aug 16, 2006 15:32:36 GMT -5
Beatles
|
|
|
|
Post by rtbuck on Aug 16, 2006 16:28:53 GMT -5
Stones all the way!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Equinox on Aug 16, 2006 16:41:30 GMT -5
Beatles and Zep are my top two, so... Stones would win some other matchups, but....
|
|
|
|
Post by MrAce on Aug 16, 2006 18:09:22 GMT -5
The Beatles
|
|
|
|
Post by Pete on Aug 16, 2006 18:47:13 GMT -5
Stones
|
|
|
|
Post by Trexx on Aug 16, 2006 20:02:06 GMT -5
The Beatles.
Because they resisted the Dark Side.
|
|
Husky430
Club Rocker
What the hell do YOU want?!
Posts: 687
|
Post by Husky430 on Aug 16, 2006 20:03:12 GMT -5
The Beatles. Because they resisted the Dark Side. Of the moon?  ;D |
|
|
|
Post by Trexx on Aug 16, 2006 20:08:33 GMT -5
Naw... I'm talking, Voodoo, the Devil, partially hydrogenated vegetable oil and face paint made from goat's blood.
|
|
|
|
Post by onering on Aug 16, 2006 21:37:53 GMT -5
Damn, these are all tough!
Beatles
|
|
|
|
Post by Frank on Aug 16, 2006 21:41:31 GMT -5
THE BEATLES BY FAR
|
|
|
|
Post by Scott on Aug 16, 2006 22:08:04 GMT -5
The Beatles... easily. |
|
mak
New Band Member
Posts: 4
|
Post by mak on Aug 17, 2006 16:41:32 GMT -5
this is too hard to pick but in the end it was The Stones for me-why? well because they were ugly-that swang it for them ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Rush862 on Aug 17, 2006 20:30:47 GMT -5
The Stones...more of what I consider a real rock and roll band
|
|
|
|
Post by kim on Aug 18, 2006 8:15:35 GMT -5
The Stones...more of what I consider a real rock and roll band Good point Rush and I have to agree. However, for me, The Beatles will always hold top spot when matched up against The Stones...or most other groups for that matter. Beatles all the way. Thanks Kim |
|
|
|
Post by hojam on Aug 18, 2006 16:08:15 GMT -5
I picked the Stones....
but that doesn't mean anything, really.
I like them both very, very much....pretty much equally, but I give the nod to the Stones for longevity.
|
|
|
|
Post by duojett71 on Aug 22, 2006 19:08:34 GMT -5
The Beatles by far. The Stones were great and wrote great songs, but I just don't think they were on the same level as The Beatles. The Beatles were pioneers and wrote in so many different styles without losing their identity. Their vocal harmonies could only really be matched by the Beach Boys and the Everly Bros. and musically they were always pushing the envelope. For a band that only recorded for about 8 or 9 years has to be one of the most prolific bands of their time. Their influence was second to none.
|
|
Amanda Blue
Garage Rocker
Here lies the lipstick and the face....so like Candy (Elvis Costello)
Posts: 361
|
Post by Amanda Blue on Sept 6, 2006 11:15:28 GMT -5
This one was tough but I had to give it to the Stones they loved their fans - & the money - enough not to walk away |
|
;D
