|
|
Post by Beach~Girl on Jul 13, 2010 18:46:05 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Trexx on Jul 13, 2010 21:22:07 GMT -5
I thought it was feeling a bit warm in here! LOL  |
|
|
|
Post by Jesse on Jul 14, 2010 8:10:44 GMT -5
Creepy
|
|
|
|
Post by Warpig on Jul 14, 2010 11:33:16 GMT -5
Now that's METAL!!!!Baby!  |
|
|
|
Post by snakesandladders on Jul 17, 2010 4:35:54 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Beach~Girl on Jul 17, 2010 17:34:22 GMT -5
Now that's METAL!!!!Baby! ...most of all,it's hard!  ;D |
|
|
|
Post by Warpig on Jul 19, 2010 10:02:27 GMT -5
Now that's METAL!!!!Baby! ...most of all,it's hard! ;D How'd you know ?  |
|
|
|
Post by Pete on Jul 19, 2010 10:23:18 GMT -5
666 aint no thang... It ain't nuttin but a chicken wang....
616 be the number of the BEAST
In May 2005, it was reported that scholars at Oxford University using advanced imaging techniques[18] had been able to read previously illegible portions of the earliest known record of the Book of Revelation (a 1,700 year old papyrus), from the Oxyrhynchus site, Papyrus 115 or P115, dating one century after Irenaeus. The fragment gives the Number of the Beast as 616 (÷ é ϛ), rather than the majority text 666 (÷ î ϛ).[1] The other early witness Codex Ephraemi Rescriptus (C) has it written in full: hexakosiai deka hex (lit. six hundred sixteen).[19]
Significantly, P115 aligns with Codex Alexandrinus (A) and Codex Ephraemi Rescriptus (C) which are generally regarded as providing the best testimony to Revelation. Thus, P115 has superior testimony to that of P47 which aligns with Codex Sinaiticus and together form the second-best witness to the Book of Revelation. This has led some scholars to conclude that 616 is the original number of the beast
|
|
|
|
Post by Warpig on Jul 20, 2010 15:26:23 GMT -5
Well leave it to Pete to ruin it for the rest of us, I suppose there's no Satan Claus either, huh? |
|
|
|
Post by snakesandladders on Jul 22, 2010 5:01:09 GMT -5
|
|
! 
